Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!fabscal!dtscp1!scott
From: scott@dtscp1.UUCP (Scott Barman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: portable way to do nap()
Message-ID: <386@dtscp1.UUCP>
Date: 10 Oct 88 17:40:45 GMT
References: <543@mpx1.UUCP> <27909@ccicpg.UUCP> <1988Oct3.230916.995@utzoo.uucp> <7548@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> <385@dtscp1.UUCP> <8654@smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: scott@dtscp1.UUCP (Scott Barman)
Organization: Digital Transmission Systems, Atlanta
Lines: 16

In article <8654@smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
|In article <385@dtscp1.UUCP> scott@dtscp1.UUCP (Scott Barman) writes:
|>I'm holding out for the improbable release of Version 9!
|
|If you'd be able to cope with it, you be able to get it,
|but as was noted in Dennis's private letter that got posted
|by mistake, it needs TLC and therefore is probably too much
|hassle for most sites.  Many of 9th Edition UNIX's nicest
|features are gradually appearing in the System V product
|anyway.

I might be more willing to deal with whatever v9 problems are than
the garbage and gunk I've been through dealing with SVr3 on the box
I am on now!

-- 
scott barman		..!gatech!dtscp1!scott