Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!tness7!ninja!merch!cpe!neese From: neese@cpe.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Future Domain SCSI controller for A Message-ID: <6800050@cpe> Date: 10 Oct 88 16:45:00 GMT References: <522@m3.mfci.UUCP> Lines: 53 Nf-ID: #R:m3.mfci.UUCP:522:cpe:6800050:000:2586 Nf-From: cpe.UUCP!neese Oct 10 11:45:00 1988 >for our '286 machines. A local dealer has recommended the >Future Domain SCSI controller and claims this works with >Xenix/Unix and that someone has this setup using Microport. > Has anyone had any experience with this board ? The FD board is a nice board, but it is a dumb board and requires the COPU to do everything (i.e. high overhead). > Does this imply a special version of Xenix ? I think, in this case, it is a generic SCO product that you can run this with. > Is this board related in anyway to the Tandy SCSI board ? > (I though the Tandy board was micro channel only) No, the Tandy board is the Adaptec SCSI AHA-1540 board. Very intelligent. It is an AT board, the MC board is not shipping yet. > Is there a better Xenix/SCSI combination ? Without sounding like a commercial, I will elaborate on the features of the Tandy board. The board has a programmable high speed DMA (up to 10MBytes/sec), command queuing (up to 255 commands), transparent SCSI bus arbitration, programmable bus on/off times, INT13 compatible BIOS, programmable mailbox architecture, automatic request sense information for errors, async/sync support transparently, and some other features that require hard drive vendors to implement. > Any clues or experiences would be appreciated. I'd love to >use SCSI as my main disk interface, but am I going to have to >run Microport to do this ? Tandy sells a version of SCO (2.2.4) which has support for the AHA-1540 (Tandy 25-4161) built in. You can boot from the SCSI drive or use it as a secondary and boot from an ST-506 drive. 2.2.4 and 2.2.3 are virtually the same except for the SCSI support in 2.2.4. The SCSI driver for 2.2.4 is a true multi-threaded driver. The driver also supports several SCSI tape drives. Neal Nelson has benchmarked a Tandy 4000 (16Mhz 386) with a SCSI 80MB and 170MB. Call them for the results. We have been using the SCSI stuff here for about 6 months and haven't had a problem. One of the systems is configured with a 80MB, 344MB and 150MB tape. Another system is configured with a 40MB and 80MB drives. The systems really run quite well (translate to: scream). One system is a news/note gateway and the other is a 16 user system. Both see an extreme amount of disk I/O and we haven't had any trouble with either. Of course in all fairness, we are an engineering site with several very experienced Xenix people on board, but I don't see why anyone would have problems with the implementation. Roy Neese Tandy Computer Product Engineering UUCP@ {killer, ninja}!cpe!neese