Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tektronix!tekcrl!tekgvs!jans From: jans@tekgvs.GVS.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Shortwaves Message-ID: <4011@tekgvs.GVS.TEK.COM> Date: 29 Sep 88 18:05:15 GMT Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or. Lines: 25 <> <...there is no such thing as "high-quality" shortwave reception, certainly nothing worth using a stereo system for. Stations fade in and out due to the vagaries of long-distance transmission, bounce off the ionosphere, and all that.> Well, at least not for the money you quoted. It is certainly possible to get considerably better quality reception than can be had with a basic receiver. Many foreign news clips come to your local station via shortwave during part of their trip, especially those of BBC, which (as of 1982, at least) had an extensive shortwave relay system. (They may have gone satellite by now.) The basic technique for improving reception that has a signal strength discontinuous in space uses what is called a "diversity combiner". Two or more receiver front-ends tuned to the same frequency are fed by antennas that are separated by a large fraction of a wavelength. The resulting signal strengths are compared, and the receiver with the strongest signal is fed to the audio. Several "golden ears" auto stereos do the same thing to eliminate or reduce multipath distortion on FM. :::::: Software Productivity Technologies -- Experiment Manager Project :::::: :::::: Jan Steinman N7JDB Box 500, MS 50-383 (w)503/627-5881 :::::: :::::: jans@tekcrl.TEK.COM Beaverton, OR 97077 (h)503/657-7703 ::::::