Xref: utzoo rec.ham-radio:6279 sci.electronics:4015 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!bionet!agate!ucbvax!hplabs!hplabsz!dleigh From: dleigh@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM (Darren Leigh) Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio,sci.electronics Subject: Re: Circular polarization vs omnidirectionality Summary: I screwed up! Keywords: antenna Message-ID: <2427@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> Date: 7 Oct 88 19:15:09 GMT References: <17770@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <2419@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> Reply-To: dleigh@hplabsz.UUCP (Darren Leigh) Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Lines: 39 In article <2419@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> dleigh@hplabsz.UUCP (Darren Leigh) writes: >In article <17770@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) writes: [John wanted an omni-directional, circularly polarized antenna. I offered the following design but got it wrong: see below] | | | | | | <- Vertical dipole | | | | | ____________|____________ | (_________________________) | | ^ | | | | | Circular loop | | (seen edge on) | | | | |For circular polarization, drive these so that the magnetic field from |the vertical is 90 degrees out of phase with the magnetic field of the |loop when it reaches the loop, and so that the magnetic field from the |loop is in phase with the magnetic field of the other side of the loop |when it gets there. In other words, make the radius of the loop an |even multiple of quarter wavelengths and drive the two parts 90 |degrees out of phase. I forgot that the current on the far side of the loop is going the opposite direction as that on the near side; therefore the diameter should be an odd multiple of half wavelengths. To do this antenna right then, the radius of the loop should be an odd multiple of quarter wavelengths and the two elements should be driven in phase. ======== Darren Leigh Internet: dleigh@hplabs.hp.com UUCP: hplabs!dleigh