Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!agate!garnet!weemba
From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: The Challenger tape: still in litigation
Message-ID: <15326@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 12 Oct 88 06:45:55 GMT
References: <15269@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <6939@nsc.nsc.com>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central
Lines: 8
In-reply-to: ken@nsc.nsc.com (Ken Trant)

In article <6939@nsc.nsc.com>, ken@nsc (Ken Trant) writes:
> Obviously one thing has a lot to do with the other. It would seem you
>disagree with the court and want the tape released and in the next breath
>you grind on the only judge to support your position.

I don't how I gave you this impression.  Nor do I care.

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720