Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!apple!rutgers!elbereth.rutgers.edu!ron.rutgers.edu!ron
From: ron@ron.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: alt.next
Subject: Re: Questions on NeXT machine
Keywords: NeXT
Message-ID: <Oct.23.12.21.15.1988.11889@ron.rutgers.edu>
Date: 23 Oct 88 16:21:16 GMT
References: <17780@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> <[9.5]karl@ddsw1.alt.next>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 9

Don't be a twit.  If NeXT is only sold to the Universities and you don't
trust Universities to not pirate your software, then why are you concerened?

Second, before you go around blasting the FSF, why don't you take the
thirty seconds it takes to read the Copyright notice.  You will find out
that the objects produced by the compiler and the included libarary
routines are not subject to the further FSF copyright.

-Ron