Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!oberon!cit-vax!cit-vlsi!wen-king From: wen-king@cit-vlsi.Caltech.Edu (Wen-King Su) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: The NeXT Problem [Disk Swapping] Message-ID: <8326@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Date: 16 Oct 88 16:33:02 GMT References: <26435@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <452@oracle.UUCP> Sender: news@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu Reply-To: wen-king@cit-vlsi.UUCP (Wen-King Su) Organization: California Institute of Technology Lines: 46 In article <452@oracle.UUCP> csimmons@oracle.UUCP (Charles Simmons) writes: >In article <26435@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> pchris@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (Chris Perleberg) writes: < >>4) Slow Optical Drive: In the past, optical drives have been significantly <> slower (seek times) than magnetic drives. What is the advantage of the >> optical drive? Cost must be less than that of the larger 330Mbyte $2K <> magnetic drive. But NeXT will be hurt once benchmarks come out for its >> i/o performance (using the optical drive). < >Something to factor into your price performance picture: I believe another
for $1550, I get 256MB of disk storage. For $1600 I get 512MB of disk seek time gets a little bit long (2 to 3 seconds) when I have to swap disks... < >For the 330 MB winchester, I'm fairly certain that you can't pop the you'ld have to attach a tape drive or floppy disk drive. 256 MB of the tape drive, your seek time is probably somewhat worse than 2 to 3