Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!boulder!ncar!tank!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!a.cs.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!grunwald
From: grunwald@m.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: The NeXT Problem [Disk Swapping
Message-ID: <3300036@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 18 Oct 88 02:16:00 GMT
References: <10293@eddie.MIT.EDU>
Lines: 9
Nf-ID: #R:eddie.MIT.EDU:10293:m.cs.uiuc.edu:3300036:000:488
Nf-From: m.cs.uiuc.edu!grunwald    Oct 17 21:16:00 1988


Actually, Mathematica already has a command, called TeXForm, that outputs
the (you guessed it) TeX form of a Mathemaica command.

There's also CForm, FortranForm, OutputForm and InputForm, plus a few others.
I've actually got a Mathematica function that outputs a Mathematica 2-d
graph using TeXForm to the pictex macros (although it's far from perfect).
While the final output representation is PostScript, the internal
representation is much higher-order (i.e. lists of Polygons, etc).