Xref: utzoo comp.sys.misc:1874 comp.os.misc:656 comp.misc:3904 comp.arch:6797 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!reed!mdr From: mdr@reed.UUCP (Mike Rutenberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc,comp.os.misc,comp.misc,comp.arch Subject: Re: press clippings Re: The NeXT machine Message-ID: <10729@reed.UUCP> Date: 24 Oct 88 06:00:30 GMT References: <360@elan.UUCP> <17479@gatech.edu> <3246@utastro.UUCP> <8300@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Reply-To: mdr@reed.UUCP (Mike Rutenberg) Organization: Reed College, Portland OR Lines: 33 In article <8300@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> wetter@cit-vax.UUCP (Pierce T. Wetter) writes: >-> [There is] *no way* [I will have my programmers write software >-> for NeXT any time soon]." (Emphasis added by poster). >-> -Bill Gates, Chairman of Microsoft [...] > Only an idiot like Bill Gates would be disappointed by the NeXt Machine. You give Mr. Gates *far* too little credit. He is a very smart, very aware gentleman. Is he disappointed? I suspect not. Remember that Microsoft is currently investing millions of dollars in technologies that are in many ways competing with what NeXT has announced. Among them: Microsoft NeXT PM/Windows <--> NeXTStep (or whatever) OS/2 <--> Mach CD/ROM <--> NeXT optical drive Microsoft would like OS/2 to be *the* exciting OS, the *obvious* choice for personal computer software development. Whatever you think of the price (yicko!), the NeXT machine is quite a bit more sexy than OS/2 on a 386. NeXT will gather developer attention & general "mindshare" that would have otherwise been focused on Microsoft (and Apple). You will note that of late there have been a number of print articles under Bill Gates name lauding Object Oriented programming, yet the NeXT machine, which is the first major machine to be delivered with such tools, does not get even a note of his praise. What ever you think of Mr. Gate's comments, I really doubt that they stem from him being disappointed. Mike