Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tank!ncar!gatech!bloom-beacon!husc6!purdue!haven!umd5!gsmith From: gsmith@umd5.umd.edu (Gordon Smith) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: Which DBMS should I switch to ? Comments pleass... Summary: XDB 2.2 Keywords: DBMS,4GL,SQL Message-ID: <4163@umd5.umd.edu> Date: 22 Oct 88 14:50:04 GMT References: <245@boake2.UUCP> Reply-To: gsmith@umd5.umd.edu (Gordon Smith) Distribution: comp.databases Organization: University of Maryland, College Park Lines: 75 In article <245@boake2.UUCP> scott@boake2.UUCP (Scott Boake) writes: > >I am in the process of evaluating several data base packages for developing >applications for clients. > >Packages under consideration are: (Other suggestions for packages which I >should be looking at are welcome!) > > 1 - Progress > 2 - Oracle > 3 - Informix 4 - XDB You should also consider XDB. I have found it very easy to use, learn and operate. > >We would like to have a package which meets the following criteria: > > 1 - Ported to many machines. (OS other than UNIX is a plus) / \/ (check) > 2 - 4GL with SQL available. / \/ > 3 - Easy to use report generator. / \/ > 4 - No need for C code for simple applications - but should allow > a "clean" intergration of C routines. By clean I mean a well > thought out interface. / \/ > 5 - Control of where data files go. (ie. split across devices, > works well with stateful remote file systems) not sure. > 6 - Knowledgeable support staff. / \/ > 7 - A history of updates and keeping the product up to the times. > Or current data base was not bad 3-4 years ago but is way out of > date now. / \/ > 8 - Quick development time. / \/ > 9 - Works with standard UNIX development tools is a plus. I would like > to be able to take the programs written in the 4GL and edit them > with any of the standard editors / use SCCS or RCS on them, etc. / \/ >----Scott > >Scott Boake Small Systems Consulting >uunet!pdn!boake2!scott P.O. Box 2142 >scott@boake2 Pinellas Park, FL 34665 - Gordon Smith P.S. Sorry about the breif nature of this message. I know it is cheep to use check marks, but I don't have a lot of time to write this.