Xref: utzoo rec.arts.startrek:15336 comp.graphics:3373
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!ncsuvx!mcnc!rti!tachyon!sch
From: sch@tachyon.UUCP (Steve Holzworth)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek,comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Star Trek II graphics: "The Genesis Effect"
Summary: Thanks Loren
Keywords: star trek graphics genesis
Message-ID: <191@tachyon.UUCP>
Date: 13 Oct 88 20:38:12 GMT
References: <277@pte.UUCP> <523@epicb.UUCP> <12672@oberon.USC.EDU> <2534@pixar.UUCP>
Organization: William G. Daniel & Associates, Cary, N.C.
Lines: 19

In article <2534@pixar.UUCP>, loren@pixar.UUCP (Loren Carpenter) writes:
> This message is in need of some commentary...
> 
	...miscellaneous about how it was REALLY done...> 
> 
> 			Loren Carpenter
> 			...{ucbvax,sun}!pixar!loren

Thanks for clearing it all up Loren!  I really wanted to comment that the
sequence was shot off a monitor, particularly after some statements others
made about film recorders, et. al.  But, I knew I had no demonstrable proof,
other than having heard about it while at Ikonas.  (The knowledge to noise
ratio of the net approaches the signal to noise ratio at times (low)).  Now,
can we move on?

						Sincerely,
						Steve Holzworth
				(former Ikonas Graphics Systems employee)
						rti!tachyon!sch