Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!microsoft!tonyw
From: tonyw@microsoft.UUCP (Tony Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Response to Bill Mitchell of Sunquest on Oregon C++
Keywords: Oregon C++, C++, ANSI C
Message-ID: <1062@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 18 Oct 88 23:32:57 GMT
References: <247@oresoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: tonyw@microsoft.UUCP (Tony Williams)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 14

In article <247@oresoft.UUCP> ken@oresoft.UUCP (Ken Cramer) writes:
>   [omitted]
>files that it requires.  Note that aside from various facilities required
>to support C++, Oregon C++ supplies just the facilities proscribed by the
>ANSI standard 
> [omitted]

Hey, yes.  Let's have parsers that only accept syntax errors,
compilers that only implement the deprecated features of Fortrash 8X etc.
I like it, I like it. :-)

To be serious, I liked the tone and content of your reply.
  Tony
disclaimer...