Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:13537 comp.lang.misc:2038
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!husc6!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Disassembling was Re: Machine-independent intermediate languages
Message-ID: <8728@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 22 Oct 88 19:51:12 GMT
References: <e2uEl#2ORJzO=eric@snark.uucp> <358@istop.ist.co.uk> <e6m10#2eDFfC=eric@snark.UUCP> <7226@ihlpl.ATT.COM> <1988Oct21.155329.14161@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <1988Oct21.155329.14161@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
-In article <7226@ihlpl.ATT.COM> knudsen@ihlpl.ATT.COM (Knudsen) writes:
->... Tandy Radio Shack software usually includes in
->the copyright notice "customer is explicitly forbidden to disassemble
->the software." ...
-This sort of restriction is very common.  Sun binary licenses include
-a similar clause.

So does Apple's.  What I wonder is, in the absence of a signed license
agreement, is any of that enforceable?