Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!hal!nic.MR.NET!tank!mimsy!eneevax!haven!purdue!decwrl!labrea!agate!pasteur!ames!amelia!fouts From: fouts@lemming. (Marty Fouts) Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Fortran 88 Message-ID: Date: 22 Oct 88 03:39:54 GMT References: <2045@unmvax.unm.edu> <657@convex.UUCP> <660@convex.UUCP> <15776@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <894@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <15821@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: news@amelia.nas.nasa.gov Distribution: comp.lang.fortran Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA Lines: 54 In-reply-to: link@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu's message of 21 Oct 88 21:07:04 GMT In article <15821@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> link@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu (Richard Link) writes: > However, I do resent this kind of condescending attitude towards > scientists who program. Remember, physicists invented the computer > and programming languages. I think we deserve our 2 cents' worth. I have tracked down this condescending attitude in a lot of programmers who have worked for / with me over the years, and it is often a response to a certain kind of arrogant physicist who makes outrageous claims like "remeber physicists invented the computer and programming languages." (;-) Although I assume Dr. Link is not one of these arrogant physicist, I have frequently had to deal with such. And with condescending programmers. Neither side does the other either good; nor themselves in the relationship. For the history books, the invention of the computer (Meaning of course, the modern stored program digital electronic computer) is lost in antiquity. Interesting claims have been made for Macauly/Echert (sp?), Von Neumann, and Turing, among others. Not all of the claimed individuals were pysicists. Depending on how you defining the invention of programming languages, you can either give credit to those who did the fundemental work in computational semantics, such as Church, Turing, Chomsky et. al; or you can give credit the independent inventors of the first handful of recognized languages. The latter batch of people are truely a mixed bag, and include physicists, mathematicians, the occasional Navy captain, and even (shudder) computer scientists, although few thought of themselves as such at the time. Even the group of people who invented Fortran weren't all physicists. Unfortunately, there is a lot of myopia in the physics/engineering community, which is increased by the condescending attitude taken by some computer scientists. (BTW, I'm neither.) I would like the physicists to notice that physics isn't the only numerical programming, and that not even all physics problems get solved the same way. I would like programming language bigots to notice that physicists have real problems to solve, and I would like to see them talk to each other, not at each other. But, its Friday night and I/ve been waiting for the Y/MP to come back up for an hour so I may as well spend my time believing in miracles as anything else. Marty -- +-+-+-+ I don't know who I am, why should you? +-+-+-+ | fouts@lemming.nas.nasa.gov | | ...!ames!orville!fouts | | Never attribute to malice what can be | +-+-+-+ explained by incompetence. +-+-+-+