Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!killer!wisner From: wisner@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Bill Wisner) Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh Subject: Re: In-Reply-To header field Message-ID: <5886@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> Date: 23 Oct 88 18:02:52 GMT References: <8810230616.AA15417@odin.think.com> Reply-To: wisner@killer.Dallas.TX.US (Bill Wisner) Organization: The Big Bang Burger Bar Lines: 10 The appropriate portions of RFC822: optional-field = / "In-Reply-To" ":" *(phrase / msg-id) phrase = 1*word ; Sequence of words word = atom / quoted-string atom = 1* An in-reply-to field can, therefore, consist of just about anything, if you interpret it as being a string of atoms.