Xref: utzoo comp.periphs:1240 comp.unix.wizards:11759 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!sgi!markb@denali From: markb@denali Newsgroups: comp.periphs,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Disk Xfer Rates vs Bus Speed Summary: ESDI faster than multiple SCSI Message-ID: <20606@sgi.SGI.COM> Date: 15 Oct 88 00:41:53 GMT References: <4198@bsu-cs.UUCP> <3531@phri.UUCP> <10199@eddie.MIT.EDU> <3877@encore.UUCP> Sender: daemon@sgi.SGI.COM Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA Lines: 33 In article <3877@encore.UUCP>, terryk@pinocchio.Encore.COM (Terence Kelleher) writes: > ESDI is an easy winner, if you compare 1 disk to 1 disk. If you are > using more disks, SCSI provides the nice features of overlapped > operations. 2 disks, with seperate controllers, on the SCSI bus will > provide very near twice the throughput of 1 drive. This is not the > case with ESDI. Which is better really depends on wheter you care > more about overall throughput or single access times. > The more sophisticated ESDI and SMD controllers are actually much faster than multiple embedded SCSI's on a single bus, too. That is, they support overlapped seek operation, command sorting, command queuing, seek optimization, and they have look-ahead, buffering and very fast fifo's. They will also support scatter-gather operation which tends to help us considerably, as you might expect. Some of my comparisons on SCSI, ESDI, and SMDE are below on our product. These are on read performance through the EFS. SCSI: 450 KBS (async, single ended, 10 MHz drive) ESDI: 980 KBS (with above features, 10 MHz drive) ESDI: 1500 KBS (with above features, 15 MHz drive) SMDE: 2100 KBS (with above features, 24 MHz drive) these numbers actually look better on an AIM benchmark, but this BM tends to provide varibale results that skew upward in many cases. As one would expect, the file system tends to slow things a bit, and of course multiple drives would up the throughput considerably in all cases. Mark Bradley "Faster, faster, until the thrill of Manager I/O Subsystems speed overcomes the fear of death." Silicon Graphics Computer Systems Mountain View, CA ---Hunter S. Thompson