Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!amdahl!uunet!steinmetz!vdsvax!barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com
From: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Connected vs. Unconnected Nets
Message-ID: <5825@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 24 Oct 88 02:17:45 GMT
References: <12440301981.30.SUE@SRI-NIC.ARPA>
Sender: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com
Reply-To: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce G. Barnett)
Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC.ARPA

In article <12440301981.30.SUE@SRI-NIC.ARPA>, HOSTMASTER@SRI-NIC writes:

>One would not find any reference to network #3 there because it has
>unconnected status, although it is a legitimate number assigned to
>General Electric.

Yes. I posted the question about RPC broadcasts on network 3 because
we like to clean up our own problems first.

We are bringing up our new gateway soon.
-- 
Bruce