Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!MSU.BITNET!08071TCP
From: 08071TCP@MSU.BITNET (Doug Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: TCP/IP on the DR11
Message-ID: <8810242339.AA15900@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 24 Oct 88 16:05:16 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 16

>If we tolerate innocuous remarks in net.signatures I'd say we have to
>tolerate comments we disagree with also, short of (perhaps)
>obscenities or commercialism which is not the issue here.

I certainly agree - "signatures" are easy enough to ignore, if you want to.

>Most so-called "pro-lifers" seem to believe a person has rights only
>up to the moment of birth.

Besides being untrue, that's as least as offensive as the original
signature!  Why don't we declare both sides even and get back to the
original purpose of this list?

Doug Nelson

These views are entirely my own, etc., etc.