Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!microsoft!glenns From: glenns@microsoft.UUCP (Glenn Steffler) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Next Amiga system Summary: Future Resolved In Two Pages Keywords: FUTURE Message-ID: <1023@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 13 Oct 88 08:17:11 GMT References: <4392@louie.udel.EDU> <723@wsccs.UUCP> Reply-To: glenns@microsoft.UUCP (Glenn Steffler) Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA Lines: 51 Bonjour! Hello! Aloha! I am new the USENET, and I feel I have something of substance to add to the current discussion on the next Amiga. The Amiga is a wonderful machine, I know, I have one (A500 w/ 1Meg 2floppies) and have enjoyed programming/gaming with it. However, my feelings about this machine are prejudiced by my previous computer (C=64), and the fact that I love the 68k, and deplore Intel architecture. This fine work of architecture (:-) has many flaws, and doesn't stand a chance against impending machines. These machines will undoubtedly leap the standard of user interface/speed/graphics/memory/sound/multitasking set by the Amiga, and do it with style! (unlike C='s style). The most important part of a computer (argue as you will) is it's ability to run software that the user wants. (i.e. "SOLUTIONS" :-) Microsoft, WordPerfect, AshtonTate, Bor(ing)land, and LOTUS define THE STANDARD (tm :-( The Amiga is destined to ride the bench of has beens if it doesn't either (1) surpass the standard, or (2) be compatable with the standard. Seeing as these companies will not support the Amiga until a large enough installed base is present (~ 5 million and growing), the Amiga MUST gain access to a TARDIS (Dr. Who :-) and move agressively into the unknown. Laugh (Cry?) as you may, the Intel 386 will be the processor of choice for business in the future. Business leads to home use, and thus Intel will dominate. The Amiga is not far enough ahead in hardware supremacy to influence this outcome. Sound with only four channels, and no major Digital Signal Processing, is very limited; MIDI is a requirement, not a 79$ option, which uses desk space/board space. The video resolution MUST be in the range of VGA (640x480) with minimum 8 bit planes for use in complex shading, and multiple plane animation. You can bet the machines yet to come will not be limited to 1 Meg of Graphics/Sound or have a MEASLY processor speed of 7+ MHz (or even 14+ MHz with CMI 2x). Fixed disk storage, and possibly optical disks are a must for any serious computer user. I should not have to pay the exhorb... mascive... er... large (:-) amounts of green gold as is now the case. The NEW AMIGA (tm) will HAVE to appeal to people as the RIGHT (?) computer for their needs. Forget the IBM compatability, rather, think about MS-WINDOWS/PM compatability. (Have you seen EXCEL, or ALDUS PAGEMAKER?, they BLOW AWAY any programs of their type for the Amiga, and they are STANDARDS!) Yea! Thats the ticket, Eh! -- Microsoft (tm) (c) (etc) does not speak for me, so why should I speak for them? Glenn Steffler glenns@microsoft.UUCP work phone: (206)-882-8080 x4171 gpsteffler@electrical.watstar.{waterloo.edu,UWaterloo.CA} #define BRAIN_DEAD_RED_HEAD (CANADA > USA) ? (TRUE) : (FALSE)