Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!mcvax!unido!sns!space
From: space@sns.UUCP (Lars Soltau)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Next Amiga system
Summary: Are you telling me that the 2000 isn't a tower?
Message-ID: <41@sns.UUCP>
Date: 24 Oct 88 15:08:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: sns.41
References: <723@wsccs.UUCP> <4988@cbmvax.UUCP> <2810@sugar.uu.net> <2416@antique.UUCP> <2863@sugar.uu.net>
Reply-To: space@sns.UUCP (Lars Soltau)
Organization: Stuttgart Net System, FRG
Lines: 17

In article <2863@sugar.uu.net> peter@sugar.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>a tower-style
>(or NeXTcube/Mac style) 2000 might have done better.

Hey, this Amiga 2000 of mine has been standing under my desk for 6 months now,
and neither the hard disk nor the Amiga itself has shown any signs of mistreat-
ment.
I agree with you that the tower design is the most ergonomic if you don't have
to change floppy disks too often. Since the Amiga does not automatically have
a hard drive, a tower chassis would be kinda nasty for all those w/o a HD.
If you have one, simply put the Amiga under your desk. Most hard disks can be
mounted vertically.
-- 
Lars Soltau	UUCP: ...uunet!unido!sns!space		BIX: -- no bucks --

Here's looking at you, kid!
		-- the Medusa