Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:23998 comp.sys.amiga.tech:2130
Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!super!udel!princeton!njin!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!chinet!mcdchg!clyde!watmath!watdragon!violet!kgschlueter
From: kgschlueter@violet.waterloo.edu (Kevin Schlueter)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Next Amiga system
Message-ID: <9028@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 88 16:58:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: watdrago.9028
References: <3590.AA3590@heimat>
Sender: daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: kgschlueter@violet.waterloo.edu (Kevin Schlueter)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 10

I'm concerned with the speed of native amiga implementations when run
(on the same processor) simultaneously with UNIX.  When I run SunTools
on a Sun 3/50, the first thing I notice is how slow and unresponsive it
is compared to my Amiga.  I realize that running SunTools on a Sun and
running native Amiga applications with Unix are not exact analogs.  
The lesson we should get from this, I think, is that we had better not
forgot that the average user really doesn't care if Unix is running but
certainly does care if his (or her) machine becomes unuseably slow.

NB:  The above is not a flame at Sun.