Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:24213 comp.sys.amiga.tech:2182 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!rocky!perley From: perley@rocky.steinmetz (Donald P Perley) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Hard Disk Performance tests, comments invited Message-ID: <12391@steinmetz.ge.com> Date: 20 Oct 88 17:38:32 GMT References: <10150@cup.portal.com> Sender: news@steinmetz.ge.com Reply-To: perley@rocky.steinmetz.ge.com (Donald P Perley) Distribution: na Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 56 In article <10150@cup.portal.com> thad@cup.portal.com (Thad Thad Floryan) writes: >Following are some most-interesting disk performance results. > The object of the comparisons are to show that "True DMA" controllers > are not always the best. In fact, the fastest times were obtained using > boards that use no DMA, instead using polled I/O to read/write data. > These were early tests and are not the fastest times obtained. > These tests show the difference between the non DMA boards and DMA boards, > ............ a bunch of benchmarks ............... These show good data rates... GREAT! As comparisons between DMA and non-DMA, they show that: non-DMA is faster than DMA OR Quantum pro-drives are faster than Seagate ST251-1 or Miniscribe 3053. OR SCSI is faster than ST506 OR The 2090 design is lacking in some other respect. Somehow, with all those variables involved, dma/non-dma doesn't jump out as the clear explanation. If this is suposed to compare DMA to non-DMA, it would make sense to use the same disk drive for both cases. Apparently they thought it was worthwhile to move the Quantum around to all the non-dma boards... why not put it on the 2090? Another consideration: Even if a non-dma controller has a higher mazimum speed, what is the impact on CPU load? Thad's point in posting this was that FFS can give transfer rates in the 500k/sec range, which is still valid, and I'm not trying to flame him..... just the part about the object of the comparisons, written by the hurricane people. -don perley