Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:20285 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:1168
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watcgl!watmum!rmpinchback
From: rmpinchback@watmum.waterloo.edu (Reid M. Pinchback)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Moratorium on zoo discussion--please
Message-ID: <6342@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Date: 16 Oct 88 14:09:50 GMT
References: <4320@bsu-cs.UUCP> <6962@dasys1.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@watcgl.waterloo.edu
Reply-To: rmpinchback@watmum.waterloo.edu (Reid M. Pinchback)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 21

In article <6962@dasys1.UUCP> tneff@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
>In article <4320@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>>It's my impression that many net readers are getting tired of this zoo
>>copyright debate.  
>
>Based on what?  Telling one's net.colleagues to shut up about a topic
>of this importance deserves a little factual support.  Has Rahul been
>getting netmail complaints or what?  I haven't seen anything.
>
>-- 
>Tom Neff			UUCP: ...!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!tneff

For those of us who ARE sick of this topic, how 'bout those who want
to discuss it stick to the "Re: Moratorium on zoo discussion--please" subject
line, while the rest of us put in a KILL file.  That way we don't have
to pay attention to those articles any more.  Alas, this still means that
people who pay for their newsfeed are stuck with the extra net volume,
but you can't keep everybody happy all of the time.  :-)


     Reid M. Pinchback