Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!ralf
From: ralf@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu (Ralf Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Speeding up old PC's
Message-ID: <3312@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 16 Oct 88 22:37:12 GMT
References: <235494b5@ralf> <1109@bucket.UUCP>
Sender: netnews@pt.cs.cmu.edu
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 25

In article <1109@bucket.UUCP> leonard@bucket.UUCP (Leonard Erickson) writes:
}In article <235494b5@ralf> Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU writes:
}<Your experience must be exclusively with systems using extremely slow logic
}<chips.  My 9.8/1 AT clone works just fine with 150ns chips....
}
}You should have paid more attention to what I posted. *my* example was a 10 
}Mhz *XT*, not an AT. And II've checked with some others. 10Mhz XT motherboards
}WILL NOT work with 150 ns RAM. 

What could possibly be so slow that 150ns chips work with the 300ns cycle time
of a 10MHz AT but not with the 400ns cycle time of a 10MHz XT?

}ps. you really need to learn *not* to edit out the credit lines from your
}followups...

PS: I normally don't, but in this case I decided to post AFTER sending
email, so I copied the screen contents into a file.  I had stripped the
"in article foo, you wrote", which is why the posted article didn't contain
credit lines.  Perhaps you need to learn not to get uptight about a one-time
oversight?
-- 
{harvard,uunet,ucbvax}!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=-=- AT&T: (412)268-3053 (school) 
ARPA: RALF@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU |"Tolerance means excusing the mistakes others make.
FIDO: Ralf Brown at 129/31 | Tact means not noticing them." --Arthur Schnitzler
BITnet: RALF%B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU@CMUCCVMA -=-=- DISCLAIMER? I claimed something?