Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!pilchuck!del From: del@Data-IO.COM (Erik Lindberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: 40 MHZ 286? Message-ID: <1015@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM> Date: 20 Oct 88 00:28:22 GMT References: <342@intek01.UUCP> <24728@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <3333@homxc.UUCP> <7761@bigtex.uucp> <670@hgcvax.uucp> <6959@dasys1.UUCP> Reply-To: del@pilchuck.Data-IO.COM (Erik Lindberg) Organization: Data I/O Corporation; Redmond, WA Lines: 29 In article <6959@dasys1.UUCP> schuster@dasys1.UUCP (Michael Schuster) writes: >In article <670@hgcvax.uucp> network@hgcvax.uucp (craig chaiken) writes: >> I read about the Tienwei 40-MHz Intel 80286 motherboard in John Dvorak's >>Viewpoint column in the Sept. 27, 1988 issue of PC Magazine. I was wondering >>if anyone has read any articles that shed more light on this subject. > >It's a hoax. >They slowed down the timers on a 10 mHz AT board to make it look as >though it was running speed programs at quadruple speed. The >current scuttlebut is that there is no "40 mHz Chang modification". >You want gold from lead? > Interesting. That reminds me of a local company here in Seattle that, for a while, was selling a machine called the "AT-Light" (sort of like a Miller Lite?) which actually contained an 8088 CPU. Apart from the misleading name, they claimed it had a "turbo mode" activated with the usual where Norton SI would get 2.7 rating. When I got mine home, it just didn't *seem* to go as fast as my other turbo-xt system. The stop watch confirmed this, regardless of what every benchmark I had reported. Opening the case revealed the machine ran at a standard 4.77 Mhz, and pressing did nothing but re-initialize the system timer to give false elapsed-time readings. I wanted to report them for blatant consumer fraud, but can you imagine trying to explain such a technical fraud to someone in the Att. Gen. office? (2 years ago besides!) -- del (Erik Lindberg) uw-beaver!tikal!pilchuck!del