Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!osmigo From: osmigo@ut-emx.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: SCORES ordeal + new(?) SCORES info Message-ID: <6931@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 15 Oct 88 15:36:41 GMT References: <6685@ut-emx.UUCP> <46700075@uxf.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: osmigo@emx.UUCP (Ron Morgan) Organization: Speech Communication UT Austin Lines: 57 [Deleted positions on posting source to SCORES] I hope we're not belaboring the point here, but I agree that the source to SCORES should NOT be posted ANYWHERE. My reasons: 1. It isn't necessary to have a "flurry of new viruses" to warrant keeping it off the lines. We only need consider the widespread misery that can be caused by ONE virus. Look at the recent post by the user who was infected at a university computer lab. Does anyone care to guess how many people will ultimately be infected by that ONE SINGLE COPY of that ONE virus? 2. I believe there is such a thing as "need to know." Good grief, keeping source code off the net isn't the same thing as a Nazi book-burning. Otherwise, we might as well applaud posts on how to manufacture explosives in your kitchen, or synthesize LSD. 3. I feel I can safely hypothesize that viruses will become more durable and pervasive over time. Each new virus, as it is ana- lyzed and as software is written to kill it, also gives would-be virus-writers a free lesson in "what not to do." Let's also keep in mind that SCORES is small-time, compared to some of the more sophisticated virii that have been written to attack mainframes and the like. The "next" generation of virii will certainly not have any "giveaways" such as the blank-document Scrapbook/Note- pad icons. It might quietly jump from application to application, skipping the System file. It might have a delayed-effect of MONTHS instead of SCORE's two days. It could target specific applications, such as backup software, for self-destruction next time they are run, instead of infecting "everything." How would you like to erase your hard disk, then find that your backup has turned into ASCII salad? 4. Correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not a programmer), but I think most people capable of analyzing a virus's source code would also be capable of writing their OWN virus-killers. We know what SCORES writes onto its targets; it would be a simple matter for a programmer to write an application to search for those strings and destroy them, if he's afraid to use the available anti-virus tools. I'm *still* dying to know what happened to the person that wrote SCORES, since his identity is reportedly known. *Surely* he was fired from his job, for example. Oh well, smile, have a nice day, and all that.....(-8 Ron =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ >--Ron Morgan--------------{ames, utah-cs, uunet}!ut-sally!ut-emx!osmigo-------< >--Univ. of Texas--{gatech, harvard, pyramid, sequent}!ut-sally!ut-emx!osmigo--< >--Austin, Texas--------osmigo@ut-emx.UUCP-------osmigo@emx.utexas.edu---------< =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+