Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!voder!pyramid!nsc!grenley
From: grenley@nsc.nsc.com (George Grenley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: Proof???
Summary: Peer Review Lives!!!
Message-ID: <7320@nsc.nsc.com>
Date: 25 Oct 88 22:53:28 GMT
References: <2582@sultra.UUCP> <7189@nsc.nsc.com> <1239@astroatc.UUCP> <6438@winchester.mips.COM> <7275@nsc.nsc.com> <6410@daver.UUCP>
Reply-To: grenley@nsc.nsc.com.UUCP (George Grenley)
Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale
Lines: 23

Numbers, Numbers - but no proof...

In article <6410@daver.UUCP> dlr@daver.UUCP (Dave Rand) writes:
>In article <7275@nsc.nsc.com> grenley@nsc.nsc.com.UUCP (George Grenley) writes:
>> [ dhrystone benchmarking stuff]
>>This is about right, depending on which test conditions you specify...
>>Our 30 meg part is around 17K...

>I get 18,335...

>Dave Rand

Dave,
That's nice, but how?  Specifically, please publish the code you ran (all of
it, including library calls, esp strcpy and strcmp).  Also please document
exactly what hardware you ran on, the wait-state environment, and the
compiler used.

Then we'll see if the number can be reproduced.  These are supposed to
be deterministic systems, you know.

Regards,
George Grenley