Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!mejac!gryphon!cadovax!mitchell
From: mitchell@cadovax.UUCP (Mitchell Lerner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: RFS...
Message-ID: <2293@cadovax.UUCP>
Date: 24 Oct 88 23:24:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: cadovax.2293
Reply-To: mitchell@cadovax.UUCP (Mitchell Lerner)
Organization: Contel Business Systems, Torrance, CA
Lines: 17

How well does it perform?

System V 3.1 offers client-side caching, is there a big performance 
improvement?  How much?

Has anybody implemented a disk-bound application under RFS, haveing
the application do alot of I/Os to the remote files and such?  Does
RFS lend itself to this at all (any better than NFS)???


How robust is it in a client or server goes down?  Can you come back up 
and continue from where you left off?
-- 
Mitchell Lerner -- UUCP:  {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!mitchell
	Don't speak to him of your heartache, for he is speaking.
	He feels the touch of an ants foot.  If a stone moves under the 
	water he knows it.