Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!killer!vector!rpp386!jfh From: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: SCO 2.2.1 uu fault Message-ID: <7889@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 14 Oct 88 18:30:45 GMT References: Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum) Organization: River Parishes Programming, Dallas TX Lines: 19 In article jl42+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jay Mathew Libove) writes: >Someone mailed to me explaining that there is a problem >with the 2.2.1 SCO uux, and that I should just use my >old 2.1.3 version. > >He's right. 2.2.1 SCO uux is busted, 2.1.3 replaces >it nicely. What exactly is wrong with it? I use it several hundred times a day for news batching, remote file copies, remote printing, etc. and don't have any problems. The example which was given, which included an argument of `localsystem!filename' should have been written `filename' Is this the problem??? Or is there something else? -- John F. Haugh II +----Make believe quote of the week---- VoiceNet: (214) 250-3311 | Nancy Reagan on Richard Stallman: InterNet: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US | "Just say `Gno'" UucpNet : !killer!rpp386!jfh +--------------------------------------