Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!agate!garnet!weemba
From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: comp.society.*
Message-ID: <16103@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 28 Oct 88 01:59:29 GMT
References: <5178@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <8187@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> <895@ncar.ucar.edu> <8280@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US> <908@ncar.ucar.edu>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods)

I'm deliberately staying out of the comp.women redebates.  But...

In article <908@ncar.ucar.edu>, woods@ncar (Greg Woods) writes:
>whether this group and other like it (such as comp.society, comp.edu and
>comp.risks) really belonged in the comp heirarchy. There was even some
>discussion about moving some of the existing groups out of comp.

So whatever happened to the idea that comp.risks, comp.edu were going
to be moved to subgroups of comp.society.*?

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720