Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!amdcad!sun!concertina!fiddler
From: fiddler%concertina@Sun.COM (Steve Hix)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: The Challenger tape: still in litigation
Message-ID: <72695@sun.uucp>
Date: 13 Oct 88 00:14:32 GMT
References: <15269@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <6939@nsc.nsc.com> <15326@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Lines: 9

In article <15326@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>, weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes:
> In article <6939@nsc.nsc.com>, ken@nsc (Ken Trant) writes:
> > Obviously one thing has a lot to do with the other. It would seem you
> >disagree with the court and want the tape released and in the next breath
> >you grind on the only judge to support your position.
> 
> I don't how I gave you this impression.  Nor do I care.

Then why respond?