Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!gatech!rutgers!att!mtuxo!mtgzz!drutx!druhi!tml
From: tml@druhi.ATT.COM (Tim Larison)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: The Challenger tape: still in litigation
Keywords: What's on the tape?
Message-ID: <3671@druhi.ATT.COM>
Date: 18 Oct 88 13:34:25 GMT
References: <15269@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <6939@nsc.nsc.com> <1505@viper.Lynx.MN.Org> <9098@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Organization: AT&T, Denver, CO
Lines: 21

In article <9098@watdragon.waterloo.edu>, daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Owner of Many System Processes) writes:
> (Bunch of stuff deleted)
> From: mmmckechnie@tiger.waterloo.edu (Mindgamer.)
> Path: tiger!mmmckechnie
> 
> >  >>> I don't how I gave you this impression.  Nor do I care.
> >  >
> >  >>Then why respond?
> >  >
>      <more words deleted>

I feel like I walked into the middle of an argument.  This isn't what
got my attention, but the subject line did.  What is allegedly on
the Challenger tapes that NASA doesn't want the public to hear?  Is
there more dialog beyond the "uh-oh" uttered by the copilot (as he
realized the shuttle was in big trouble)?  Has anybody heard any
speculation as to what was said by the crew on these tapes?


                                 Tim Larison
                                 att!druhi!tml