Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!telebit!rls From: rls@telebit.UUCP (Richard Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Which is best? Summary: Telebit and SDLC a slight clarification Message-ID: <302@telebit.UUCP> Date: 1 Nov 88 16:58:46 GMT References: <9515@conexch.UUCP> <1125@vsi1.UUCP> <299@telebit.UUCP> <10711@cup.portal.com> Distribution: na Organization: Telebit Corporation, Cupertine, CA Lines: 33 In article <10711@cup.portal.com>, David@cup.portal.com (David Michael McCord) writes: > > To dredge up my old opinions on the topic, neither the USR or the Telebit is > worth a damn when it comes to global networking, or when supporting most > real-world communications applications (SNA/SDLC, X.25, etc.). The Telebit > product does not even support synchronous transmission, not to mention the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Actually, Telebit does manufacture a product, the T2000, which supports the SNA/SDLC modes. It is functionally a superset of the TrailBlazer Plus, with the addition of SNA/SDLC support. So you can have all of the advantages (at least as we at Telebit see them :-) of PEP, and SNA/SDLC support for your IBM machines. I don't usually talk much about it, because this newsgroup has generally expressed little interest in that area. David's other points about V.32 as an emerging standard are well taken, but (and here come's the bias!) I think that it won't quite deteriorate that quickly or as severely. I don't want to start another V.32 vs. Telebit debate. This newsgroup has seen enough of that. Let's all sit back and see what happens! Thanks for your interest, David! Regards, ========================================================================== Richard Siegel Phone: (415) 969-3800 Product Manager UUCP: {sun,uunet,ames,hoptoad}!telebit!rls Telebit Corporation ARPA: telebit!rls@ames.ARPA "We are, after all, professionals"...HST ==========================================================================