Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!pcrat!rick
From: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: V32 will smash TB+ in a year (?)
Message-ID: <614@pcrat.UUCP>
Date: 10 Nov 88 12:02:31 GMT
References: <10805@cup.portal.com> <1417@percival.UUCP> <11078@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson)
Distribution: na
Organization: PC Research, Inc., Tinton Falls, NJ
Lines: 26

In article <11078@cup.portal.com> David@cup.portal.com (David Michael McCord) writes:
>How many sites presently using trailblazers will find it necessary in the 
>near future to buy an additional 9600bps modems (v.32, natch) to support high 
>speed applications, instead of simply re-using their existing equipment?  

There is currently no place I need to talk that has V.32.  My priority
list is as follows:

	1) PEP (which I've already got)
	2) FAX
	3) Courier HST
	4) 2400
	5) 1200
	6) 0-600
	7) new 28k PEP
	8) V.32 (4800 baud fallback which Bill just proposed is OK).
	9) (need nine protocols for name to work:-) )

Stick all this in one modem.  Call it the Telebit D-niner "Bulldozer".
Talk about connectivity!  Only ubiquitous ISDN will make this modem obsolete.

-- 
Rick Richardson | JetRoff "di"-troff to LaserJet Postprocessor|uunet!pcrat!dry2
PC Research,Inc.| Mail: uunet!pcrat!jetroff; For anon uucp do:|for Dhrystone 2
uunet!pcrat!rick| uucp jetroff!~jetuucp/file_list ~nuucp/.    |submission forms.
jetroff Wk2200-0300,Sa,Su ACU {2400,PEP19200} 12013898963 "" \r ogin: jetuucp