Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!vsi1!daver!dlr
From: dlr@daver.UUCP (Dave Rand)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: V.32 will dominate the marketplace (Was: Re: Which is best?)
Message-ID: <7337@daver.UUCP>
Date: 11 Nov 88 04:05:18 GMT
References: <407@telly.UUCP> <1245@nusdhub.UUCP>
Reply-To: dlr@daver.UUCP (Dave Rand)
Organization: Association for the Prevention of Polar Bears and Kangaroos
Lines: 17

In article <1245@nusdhub.UUCP> rwhite@nusdhub.UUCP (Robert C. White Jr.) writes:
> PEP 19.2 vs V.32 9600 only
>apears to be a 2-to-1 speed difference, agregate throughput discounts
>the PEP substancially (for many applications I can think of) towards
>V.32.

This is the difference between a $500/mo and a $1,000/mo. Or $50 and $100.
Or whatever you want to make it.

I _know_ my telebits have paid for themselves. Even if I scrap them, like
the (multiple) 300 bps modems I had. And the (multiple) 1200 bps modems.
And the (multiple) 2400 bps modems.

Technology continues, and we will _all_ scrap these modems, sooner or later.
-- 
Dave Rand
{pyramid|hoptoad|sun|vsi1}!daver!dlr