Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!killer!vector!nobody From: flatline!erict@uunet.UU.NET (j eric townsend) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: More Houston bbs's vs Southwestern Bell Message-ID: Date: 22 Oct 88 18:21:42 GMT Sender: chip@vector.UUCP Lines: 16 Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp Supersedes: X-Submissions-To: telecom@bu-cs.bu.edu (TELECOM Digest Coordinator) X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp (USENET Telecom Moderator) X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 8, issue 164, message 7 {{{ This message was mangled. The first two lines were interspersed }}} {{{ in the message header, and the de-digestifier munched them. I }}} {{{ manually fixed this message and am reposting. -chip }}} There are a lot of Usenet nodes in Texas -- with quite a few being bbses, I think. (I guess I could go count [u,d].usa.tx.* Nah... :-) Anyway, how will it affect us? The way I interpret SWB's decision, we're in trouble as well, as soon as they find out about us. Maybe we could get the PUC addicted to Usenet, then they'd stick up for it. :-) -- "Imitation is the sincerest form of Television." - Mighty Mouse (and R. Bakshi) J. Eric Townsend smail: 511 Parker #2, Houston, Tx, 77007 Inet: COSC3AF@george.uh.edu UUCP: uunet!nuchat!flatline!erict Bitnet: COSC3AF@UHVAX1.BITNET ..!bellcore!tness1!/