Xref: utzoo comp.emacs:4557 comp.lang.c:13776 comp.sys.ibm.pc:20817 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!arisia!quintus!ok From: ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe) Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Programming and international character sets. Message-ID: <621@quintus.UUCP> Date: 2 Nov 88 12:03:14 GMT References: <532@krafla.rhi.hi.is> <8804@smoke.BRL.MIL> <207@jhereg.Jhereg.MN.ORG> Sender: news@quintus.UUCP Reply-To: ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe) Organization: Quintus Computer Systems, Inc. Lines: 12 In article <207@jhereg.Jhereg.MN.ORG> mark@jhereg.MN.ORG (Mark H. Colburn) writes: >In article <8804@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) writes: >>In article <532@krafla.rhi.hi.is> kjartan@rhi.hi.is (Kjartan R. Gudmundsson) writes: >>>How difficult is it convert american/english programs so that they can >>>be used to handle foreign text? [etc.] Xerox have supported a 16-bit character set (XNS) for years. Some of the surprises mentioned by Mark Colburn have been no news to Interlisp-D programmers for a long time. The kludges being proposed for C & UNIX just so that a sequence of "international" characters can be accessed as bytes rather than pay the penalty of switching over to 16 bits are unbelievable.