Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!imagine!pawl17.pawl.rpi.edu!kibo
From: kibo@pawl17.pawl.rpi.edu (James Parry)
Newsgroups: comp.fonts
Subject: MetaFont vs. PS
Message-ID: <1634@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU>
Date: 3 Nov 88 02:10:19 GMT
Sender: news@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU
Reply-To: kibo ()
Organization: RPI Public Access Workstation Lab - Troy, NY
Lines: 10

*sigh*.  I hate these arguments about which (of any two things) is better,
when the two are used for different purposes.

Incidentally, has anyone ever tried porting MetaFont to run under PS, or
vice versa?  That should make everyone happy.

--
James "Kibo" Parry
Userfe0n@rpitsmts (bitnet)
Userfe0n%mts.rpi.edu@itsgw.rpi.edu
Yes, I like them both.