Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c++:1873 comp.sys.next:500
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!kth!draken!liuida!mikhe
From: mikhe@tragicomix.liu.se (Mike Henry)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Objective-C vs C++
Summary: You can't beat a Wizard around a bush...
Message-ID: <1019@tragicomix.liu.se>
Date: 1 Nov 88 23:47:56 GMT
References: <8335@nlm-mcs.arpa> <3438@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Organization: CIS Dept, Univ of Linkoping, Sweden
Lines: 16

In article <3438@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> david@beowulf.JPL.NASA.GOV (David Smyth) writes:
>...
>REALLY do is create a new, GOOD object language, and call it, say, ++C,
>and use it instead.  Besides, the name would then be semantically
>correct! :-)

    Does this imply that we should enhance C-language BEFORE using it??
    Wow, thats what I call fast learning!! (or does THAT imply something
    else... B^)

		-Mike
-- 
INET : mikhe@majestix.liu.se                                          ///
UUCP : {seismo,mcvax,munnari}!enea!liuida!majestix!mikhe             ///
ARPA : mikhe%majestix.{ida.liu.se,UUCP}@seismo.CSS.GOV           \\\/// What
SNAIL: Mike Henry, Alsattersg. 3C:20, S-582 51 Linkoping SWEDEN   \XX/ Else??