Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!rutgers!njin!princeton!phoenix!mbkennel
From: mbkennel@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Matthew B. Kennel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: FORTRAN 88
Message-ID: <4164@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 28 Oct 88 19:36:33 GMT
References: <669@convex.UUCP> <5826@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com> <74284@sun.uucp> <5833@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>
Reply-To: mbkennel@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Matthew B. Kennel)
Distribution: na
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 20

In article <5833@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com> lamson@sierra.uucp (scott h lamson) writes:
>
>... I have used two Fortran compilers on the CRAY-2, one of which runs
                                              ^^^^^^ !!
>about ten times longer (cft77 written in Pascal) than the other (cft2
>written in assembler).  [stuff deleted]
>  So within one order of magnitude,
>compile time is, for me, not a concern.  Functionality and optimized
>resultant code is just more important. 


Perhaps there's a connection here?  :-)






Matt K
mbkennel@phoenix.princeton.edu