Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!ece-csc!mcnc!xanth!nic.MR.NET!tank!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxg.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdonald
From: mcdonald@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: INCLUDE .vs. MODULE
Message-ID: <50500086@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 26 Oct 88 15:10:00 GMT
References: <917@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Lines: 7
Nf-ID: #R:mace.cc.purdue.edu:917:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:50500086:000:362
Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdonald    Oct 26 10:10:00 1988


I believe that the MAJOR problem with module as opposed to include
is that what can be placed in a module is limited. ANYTHING and
be placed in an include. In any case, since include is present 
standard practice, it must be included (sorry for the pun) in any
useful compiler anyway - so if it is not in the standard, people
are going to laugh at the standard.