Xref: utzoo comp.misc:3969 alt.bbs:177 Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!apple!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!megatest!palowoda From: palowoda@megatest.UUCP (Bob Palowoda) Newsgroups: comp.misc,alt.bbs Subject: Re: Houston bbs's vs SW Bell - more Message-ID: <949@megatest.UUCP> Date: 31 Oct 88 10:08:51 GMT References: <1947@uokmax.UUCP> Distribution: usa Organization: Megatest Corporation, San Jose, Ca Lines: 36 > However, I think you should realize -- that's NOT how they claim to do it! A > business line is to charge people that make MONEY by using those phone lines. > I assure you, my BBS doesn't make a dime for me -- indeed, I lose the bucks > for the phone line. > I too run a bbs for non profit at a loss. But SW Bell is sucsessful and other local carriers adopt the structure it will give me the reason I need to write it off on the IRS. > Why charge it for a business when it's not? Okay, if they're going to change > the whole definition of a business line, that's one thing -- but that's only > a fantasy that you've given us. The truth us, they've defined BBS's as > obviously being businesses for profit using the phone lines -- and in most > cases, that's simply untrue. One of their points is that bbs are non-profit organizations, which they are charge commercial rates to these organizations. I don't think they have a leg to stand on from occured use, but there is other points (legal) to look at. > > Mind you, there are systems that are pay and make a profit. More power to > Bell where those are concerned -- they are business; they should have > business lines. But to tell me that *I* am a business? I'd say not. You are not a "business", you and your users are a non-profit organ. If you want to have fun start writeing your assembly-man and represenative to well define this. ---Bob -- Bob Palowoda Work: {sun,decwrl,pyramid}!megatest!palowoda Home: {sun,pryamid}aeras!grinch!legends!fiver!palowoda BBS: (415)656-9386 2400/1200 Voice:(415)656-9384