Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!gandalf.cs.cmu.edu!ntanaka
From: ntanaka@gandalf.cs.cmu.edu (Nobuyoshi Tanaka)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Re: Mailing lists and the BW they consume
Message-ID: <3483@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 4 Nov 88 18:15:53 GMT
References: <8811040331.AA00880@rutgers.edu>
Sender: netnews@pt.cs.cmu.edu
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 17

In article <8811040331.AA00880@rutgers.edu> "NJITX::HXN8477" <hxn8477%njitx.decnet@njitc.njit.edu> writes:
>If only one copy is
>sent to host x in NJ and the duplication takes place locally, rather than
>at host y, a great deal of unnecessary traffic can be eliminated.  All that
>is needed is software at each host to do the duplication.

RFC822 defines this way of delivery, isn't it?
--Nobu
--
 Nobuyoshi Tanaka         Internet: ntanaka@cs.cmu.edu
  NEC Corporation         Voice:    +1 (412) 268-7673
  (currently at CMU)                         CMU-ROSE :-)

-- 
 Nobuyoshi Tanaka         Internet: ntanaka@cs.cmu.edu
  NEC Corporation         Voice:    +1 (412) 268-7673
  (currently at CMU)                         CMU-ROSE :-)