Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wyse!mips!prls!pyramid!oliveb!amdahl!pacbell!well!pokey
From: pokey@well.UUCP (Jef Poskanzer)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: comp.sources.unix
Message-ID: <7598@well.UUCP>
Date: 9 Nov 88 08:57:58 GMT
References: <686@pcsbst.UUCP>
Reply-To: Jef Poskanzer <jef@rtsg.ee.lbl.gov>
Organization: Paratheo-Anametamystikhood Of Eris Esoteric, Ada Lovelace Cabal
Lines: 13

In the referenced message, cochise!mike@pcsbst.UUCP (Mike Schroeder) wrote:
>In article <7541@well.UUCP> Jef Poskanzer <jef@rtsg.ee.lbl.gov> writes:
>>                     Suggestion: every moderated group should be required
>>to have at least two moderators.
>
>hmm, that could lead to coordination problems.

Sci.med.aids seems to do just fine with its multiplicity of moderators.
---
Jef

             Jef Poskanzer   jef@rtsg.ee.lbl.gov   ...well!pokey
          Of course there's no reason for it; it's just our policy.