Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osu-cis!att!ihlpm!jmdavis
From: jmdavis@ihlpm.ATT.COM (Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: 1.3 Shell Bug?
Summary: why not "RUN SHELL cp filea fileb"?
Message-ID: <2548@ihlpm.ATT.COM>
Date: 3 Nov 88 18:31:47 GMT
References: <5136@louie.udel.EDU>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois
Lines: 21

> 
>  Complaints of a shell/cli problem with alias's like
> 
> Alias cp copy
>
> run cp filea fileb
>

I don't have 1.3, but the problem here seems to be that RUN invokes
the non-shell CLI while the shell is what translates the cp. So
why not execute something like:

	run shell cp filea fileb
	
What gives?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
			Mike Davis ..!att!ihlpm!jmdavis

char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}