Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!pacbell!pbhyf!che
From: che@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Mitch Che)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: AT&T 6386 vs Compaq 386/20
Message-ID: <4119@pbhyf.PacBell.COM>
Date: 29 Oct 88 01:09:47 GMT
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 13

I'm looking at AT&T's 6386 (20MHz) package CPU 373 with an 80MB hard
disk.  This is about $1700. less than our prices for a comparable
Compaq 386/20 package (with a 40 MB disk).  Our micro support group
suggested sticking with the Compaq, mentioning something about low
Norton performance on the AT&T.  (Considering we're still using IBM
PC/XT's, anything is going to look faster!)  However, anyone have some
specific numbers or comparisons they could provide me?  (Or direct me
to?) Thanks in advance.
-- 
Mitch Che   Pacific Bell   415-823-2454
---------------------------------------   "Samantha was surprisingly quiet...
disclaimer, disclaimer, too               I found her eating my ID badge..."
uucp:{ames,bellcore,sun}!pacbell!pbhyf!che  	      Tales of a dog-owner