Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Turbo C 2.0 / pricing reality, buil
Message-ID: <4539@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: 28 Oct 88 22:14:19 GMT
References: <182@imspw6.UUCP> <16800385@clio> <1724@dataio.Data-IO.COM> <1126@microsoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 9

In article <1126@microsoft.UUCP> t-stephp@microsoft.UUCP (Stephen Poole) writes:
>QuickC 1.0 had a problem
>with a certain OLD Western Digital controller due to a BIOS flaw that
>Western Digital promptly fixed.

Why on earth would a C compiler be dependent on specific disk controller
hardware?
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi