Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!dalcs!lane From: lane@dalcs.UUCP (John Wright/Dr. Pat Lane) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Norton SD program problem Message-ID: <3060@dalcs.UUCP> Date: 28 Oct 88 03:17:57 GMT Article-I.D.: dalcs.3060 References: <12440034836014@KL.SRI.COM> <11@gsy1.UUCP> <1062@acornrc.UUCP> <4374@rayssd.ray.com> <3057@dalcs.UUCP> Reply-To: lane@dalcs.UUCP (John Wright/Dr. Pat Lane) Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada Lines: 29 For what it's worth, Computer Shopper magasine, several months ago (forget which issue and I'm not at home to look it up...sorry), feature an article reviewing disk de-fragger's. It compared Norton's SD, Paul Mace Utilities, and several others (did *not* include DOG as I recall). They had problems with Norton's SD and recommened against using it until Norton brings out a revision which successfully fixes the problems. They gave top marks to Mace. It was by far the slowest but also by far gave the best performance and seemed the most robust (I forget the details of the testing procedures). They cautioned against using a de-fragger with any TSR's or installed device drivers which could potentially interfere with with the de-fragger...and this was not limited to disk cache's and the like but also to other seemingly innocuous programs which could alter timing considerations or cause missed interrupts and the like (...I don't really know what I'm talking about there, that's just how I remember it). This was, in fact, related to the problems with SD and most de-fraggers warn you about it anyway (some refuse to op- erate if they detect any). If anyone likes, I can easily look up the issue and provide further details. Cheers...JW . -- John Wright ///////////////// Phone: 902-424-3805 or 902-424-6527 Post: c/o Dr Pat Lane, Biology Dept, Dalhousie U, Halifax N.S., CANADA B3H-4H8 Cdn/Bitnet: lane@cs.dal.cdn Arpa: lane%dalcs.uucp@uunet.uu.net Uucp: lane@dalcs.uucp or {uunet,watmath,utai,garfield}!dalcs!lane