Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!labrea!decwrl!sun!chiba!khb
From: khb%chiba@Sun.COM (Keith Bierman - Sun Tactical Engineering)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: comp.mathematica - discussion
Message-ID: <75089@sun.uucp>
Date: 28 Oct 88 04:45:01 GMT
References: <46100228@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <961@ccnysci.UUCP> <1555@sunny3.che.clarkson.edu>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Distribution: na
Lines: 17
In-reply-to: kweeder@sunny3.che.clarkson.edu's message of 27 Oct 88 13:20:23 GMT


In article <1555@sunny3.che.clarkson.edu> kweeder@sunny3.che.clarkson.edu (Jim Kweeder) writes:



   I agree with Mike.  However, wouldn't it be appropiate to create a newsgroup
   for all symbolic math packages (mathematica, maple, macsyma)?  I don't know
   if there's enough traffic to warrant two or three groups and maple/macsyma 
   discussion is likely to end up there anyway.  If the group becomes too
   congested, we can split it up later.


It already exits. It is called sci.math.symbolic .

There is no reason to have a mathematica one, the traffic is not large
(yet.... and this is not a new newsgroup).
Keith H. Bierman
It's Not My Fault ---- I Voted for Bill & Opus