Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!bionet!apple!bloom-beacon!spdcc!ima!haddock!suitti From: suitti@haddock.ima.isc.com (Steve Uitti) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: ToMultifinder enhancement?? Message-ID: <10519@haddock.ima.isc.com> Date: 7 Nov 88 22:10:01 GMT References: <8811071759.AA08474@decwrl.dec.com> Reply-To: suitti@haddock.ima.isc.com (Steve Uitti) Organization: Interactive Systems, Boston Lines: 35 >Attached is version 2.2 of ToMultiFinder, a shareware utility that lets >you choose between the Finder and MultiFinder at startup time. I'm a little curious why you'd want such a beast, other than for user friendliness. >- Remembering your choice of Finder, MultiFinder, or another program Set Startup does this. >- Ability to chain another program before launching Finder or MultiFinder. Set Startup? I've never wanted to do this. > --Rich When I first got my Mac II (fall 87), I used (single) finder only. Most (noncommercial) things I tried to run under Multifinder died horribly and often. (Of course, many things simply didn't work reliably under any conditions, and they have slowly been weeded out). Then spring 88 came along, and with it, LSC 3.0 with the best debugger I've ever used. It requires Multifinder. It is such a pain to switch back and forth, so for awhile I'd just try to run everything under Multifinder. Well, this didn't require much more weeding, so now I only use Multifinder. In fact, the only time I use (single) finder is when 2 Meg of RAM isn't going to be enough for something (recording 80 seconds of sound with Macrecorder, or using PixelPaint). When I do this, I also generally want to not load macsbug (or macsIIbug, or whatever). The manuals say that booting while holding down the command key starts the (single) finder. Booting while holding down the mouse button inhibits macsbug (etc., saving tremendous amount of memory). Booting while holding everything down results in a memory efficient system. So I don't even do SetStartUp. Sure it isn't exactly user friendly, but it is convenient and quick and efficient and doesn't require an additional byte of disk space. I recognize the problems with technology transfer (this won't be the best solution for everyone), but my solution to these problems is cheaper. Stephen.